Friday, September 18, 2020

 Few thoughts to chew on...


  1. Age is just a number. You become what you believe. It’s all in your head. Your body reacts to your state of mind. If you think and behave like a child, you will look like a child. Similarly if you think like an old person, you will become an old person.


  1. So keep some childishness always alive for most part of the day if not all the time. Doesn’t make you less intelligent in any way although it is perceived to be.


  1. Perception about yourself is just an illusion you are creating and maintaining to project your intended image to others. It is not a truthful image but a fake one. Perception management and manipulation leads to lies, deceit and dishonesty.


  1. Now why do we want to project an image that is not truthful? Answer is because of the way society or present structure of the world is. You are told that you have to have certain kind of personality to hold a certain position or job. That is not true.


  1. You can be true to your own personality and do the work just fine. But people simply accept it and instead of being true to their own personality they start to copy or mimic the behaviour that has been associated with that job position. All this leads to a world full of fake and pretentious people. Which is the current state of today’s world.


  1. Because people work hard to maintain a fake perception about themselves they have to have that extra stress.


  1. First of all they must dispel this fact that they are fooling anybody with this fake image. Most know their reality and others simply do not care.


  1. Working late than what is required and keeping any work pending for long doesn’t make one appear sincere or thoughtful. Instead it makes him/her inefficient in reality.


  1. It would have been much better to spend that time and energy on actually doing that work quickly rather than making it appear that one was extra thoughtful. That is not fooling anyone. So it is better to be truthful and refrain from creating or maintaining an “image”.


  1. Your work is not your whole life. It is only a part of it. A rather insignificant one. Just a source of income to sustain you and your family. That’s what it is. Nothing more. Nothing less. Don’t fall into propaganda that makes it something more important than your family and personal life. There will always be someone to replace you in your workplace but no one can replace you in your family.


  1. There is no need to overthink and make any work more complex than what it actually is. Concentrate on the core areas of work. Any addition or bloating up of work is due to the way it was done by previous people. It was their way not essentially the only or right way. Just do your core work sincerely, judiciously and most importantly, in time and go home.

  2. For me, attitude and integrity are most important things. More important than being smart or intelligent. Each work is defined and with time and experience ANYONE can do it. Merit is a myth. People devalue and underestimate themselves due to false propaganda. Again, it’s all in your head.


  1. Doing a work smartly is basically a deviation from the defined way of doing work. It is not required and is unethical most of the time. All questions are ethical and if something leads to unethical practice then it must be discarded.

  2. There is greed in the world because people have been programmed to desire for artificial needs. Several artificial needs are continuously created through advertisements, media and society. Having more money, big car, big home, more jewelry, certain expensive products etc are artificial needs. The desire for these artificial needs drives people to the path of immorality and unethical ways.

  3. The visible effect of this is the corruption of human mind. A person becomes tempted to do anything for these artificially created need. An obvious solution will be to devalue the ideas of being rich, famous, having more possessions, power and stop worshiping money. Instead if ideas of honesty, simplicity and knowledge are held over money and power then you can see the element of corruption slowing dissipating from the world.


  1. Integrity needs no rule. And freedom knows no boundary. Any authority or rule that restricts one’s freedom and denies his right full entitlements must be destroyed.


  1. "The definition of freedom is the infinite value of the human being. The definition of evil is the destruction of freedom. Everything that is evil teaches people that they have limited value."


  1. "Truth is always simple. All people recognize truth because all people are intelligent beings. It is the nature of evil to create artificially complex ideas like laws and rules. It does it to hide or obfuscate the freedom it destroys."


  1. "If you remove the complexities and fears from your life you will find a plain and beautiful truth. That truth is the nature of your worth. While evil seeks to destroy or hides a person’s worth, freedom shows humans their full potential and their full value. Nothing on earth is more valuable than you."


  1. Think, speak and act what feels right to you. Nothing is blasphemous, seditious or reprehensible. No thought that you can think of, however weird, has not already been expressed.


  1. When you disagree but you don’t say no or are silent, it is taken as consent and very soon it will manifest into your reality. Think, speak and act righteously and leave the rest on universe. It will create conditions that will ensure justice and happiness in your life. And if everyone thinks like this then our collective consciousness will create that desired reality.

Forbidden Knowledge 

(or Heathenish Superstitions?)

        "In the Egyptian Mysteries the Neophyte was taught that when the physical aspect of man's conscious state is inhibited, or made dormant, or suspended by accident, injury, poison, or other causes, he is then in that unconscious state where his Spiritual Consciousness rules, and he experiences the sensation of the Fourth Dimension, wherein Immortality reigns." 


        "Today, by the aid of astronomy, psychology, psychoanalysis, physiology, comparative religion, comparative mythology, and all the other branches of learning that concern "man's relation to the Universe", we are finding the road that leads on to the profound mysteries of Ancient Science. We are discovering that Matter is condensed Spiritual Substance, and that the body is literally the Temple of Man. Hence, it is our primary duty to learn how to keep our body healthy and vigorous, that it may be a fit Temple in which to deify Man."


        "Birth and Death are two deluding aspects of the same thing. Physical birth may be termed spiritual death, and spiritual birth is regarded as physical death. For due to false teaching, man is never more spiritually dead man when physically alive.

        The condensation of the spirit builds the body that appears to be born; and the animating spirit that leaves the body and reunites with the Divine Essence, appear to die. These appearances are misleading illusions. We reason from what we THINK we see, and say that man dies, or the Sun rises -- whereas man only appears to die, and the Sun only appears to rise.

        Birth into the physical world may be termed death as we leave the spiritual world, the Kingdom of Heaven. What we term death in the physical world is actually birth in the spiritual world as we pass on to that glorious Future Life. Creative processes move in cycles."

                    --- Hilton Hotema (Book - Cosmic Science of the Ancient Masters, 1960)

     

        There appears to be too much truth in above statements. Such books are not easily available. They are either suppressed, ridiculed, banned or heavily censored. I happened to come across this author and his books while researching on how to be in good health. I have had few health problems and needed to know what I was dealing with. I browsed through many books but the book - "Man's higher consciousness" completely baffled me. Any normal person may find the book very preposterous! However, I am open to any new idea or concept. This is because I spent a lot on medical tests and doctors. But they could not diagnose my problem. Hence, I turned to alternative medicines and therapies. I read a lot and came across Hilton Hotema's books. It's contents resonates with me and I feel that he had many truths to tell. Besides health, he wrote on many occult topics. Such material is very hard to find. It seems old and ancient knowledge have been rubbished as "heathenish superstitions". But why should they not be available? Reader knows wiser. Books like "The end of all evil", "The most dangerous superstition", "Animal Farm", "1984", books by Hilton Hotema, etc. are eye openers and must be read by all.

        Have we been programmed with propaganda? Have we been fed lies about many things? Or more true, have we been denied alternative knowledge? The answer appears to be YES. For an inquisitive mind questions like - "Who are we?", "Where did we come from?", "What are we doing here?", "Nature of the reality and one's existence" etc. continuously nag. Such question doesn't bother a materialist however. He is stuck in the complexity and cobwebs of the physical world because he believes that it is all there is. So a living creature is merely complex interactions of atoms, molecules, chemicals in motion and it has no existence when it dies. Such questions may not have much relevance and usefulness in the utilitarian world that has been created, but many people have a feeling that there is something more than physical world and beyond death.  

        The quest to know answers to such questions leads to many truths and exciting revelations. Though modern science considers it as wishful thinking, personal delusions and superstitions, but it's pursuit leads to spiritual awakening and one becomes clearer in his beliefs. It leads to complete change of one's outlook and life. Life feels more pleasant, fulfilling and peaceful compared to stressful, cut-throat competitive and rat race which is the modern materialistic world. 

    If you have experienced a spiritual awakening, you have come to see through the lies and illusions of this world. Deep in your soul, you realize that nothing external has ever, and can ever, bring you true happiness or fulfillment. This profound realization leaves you craving for something richer, more fulfilling, and something that will make you feel whole once again. When we undergo a spiritual awakening, we literally “wake up” to life. We begin to question our old beliefs, habits, and social conditioning, and see that there is much more to life than what we have been taught. 

    Thoughts, ideas and answers starts to trickle to our minds about everything. Answers and concepts that are thought provoking. Most of which are against the norms of society in general (what we have been taught). Ideas or concept like religion, leadership, authority, democracy, socialism, nationalism or any -isms, , constitution, laws etc. fell flat in light of the knowledge that trickles to the mind. Vices like greed, envy, arrogance, dishonesty etc. fades and we feel one with everyone and everything.  Without experiencing a spiritual awakening, we go throughout life pursuing the emptiness of money, fame, power, and respect in an attempt to find “happiness.” While the spiritual awakening process can feel painful and disturbing at first, it ultimately helps you to live a more meaningful life. The sensation that your life doesn’t make sense anymore is the product of having all of your former beliefs, desires, and paradigms challenged and often disproven. This is traumatic, but a necessary part of your awakening. 

    I started to find flaws in everything that were taught since childhood days. It looked like everything is like a made-up story to kill the curiosity of any general human being. Most are outright lies. Why can't truth be told to masses? People are intelligent. They can handle it. There is a famous dialogue in the movie Men in Black (the first one) where the actor Tommy Lee Jones tells Will Smith when Will asks the same question. He says, "A person is smart, but people are not." It is correct because people have been told lies, fed propaganda and programmed to act in certain ways. That's what society, television, movies, media or any structure of modern society does. They have conditioned people into mindless robots going about, doing their jobs, consuming things, entertaining themselves but never asking right questions. They have been programmed into thinking about what constitutes a good life, how a person should behave and what he should do to become "successful". They believe everything that are told to them by some authority figures. They have leaders in each field to do all the thinking for them and they just need to carry on their lives as conditioned by the social structures. All questions have been answered and hence no independent thinking is required. They have been intentionally made economically weak so that they spend their whole life toiling hard to earn a living. Hence, no time to think and ask questions. Despicable social engineering.

    What is the greatest fear people have? In most cases, it is death. But death is spiritual birth. Ancient Masters taught that. It is transition to the spiritual world. There is nothing to fear about it. But that fear has been made a tool to intimidate people and force them to submit to the will of an authority. When people don't fear anything they can't be enslaved. No fear, no intimidation, no slavery. 


    What brings happiness? Money is a means to fulfil desires. But happiness has to come from within. Deep in your soul, you realize that nothing external has ever, and can ever, bring you true happiness or fulfillment. True happiness comes only when your conscience is clear and your mind is at peace. Devoid of any regrets. Honesty and simplicity are means to keep your conscience clean. Complexity and obscurity are the tools of evil for deception. Truth is always simple. The present world has been made complex and people have been deceived about most things. No wonder most are spiritually dead. Their thoughts are not their own and they do whatever authority (society, governments, etc.) tells them to do. They create a false perception about themselves and want to be perceived in that way. They like to be in an opinion of majority. They want to play safe. They go along with the flow. Thus, they reinforce the system.


Monday, September 14, 2020

My Book - "Thoughts of a liberated mind"




Support me  : 

 Buy my book- Links:
 




or Donate @ : paypal.me/FullyAwake 

Thank You.
 

Chapter 1 of my book - "Thoughts of a liberated mind"

                                                                          Copyrighted material from the book - Thoughts of liberated mind

1. Natural Law

          What is natural law? It is: “Everyone has free will. So do not do anything that you don’t want to be done to you or to your free will.”  

          It is the law that is. It is the truth. It is in our heart and consciousness. It is not specific to people or culture. It is the same for all human beings. Although it is in the consciousness of each individual, it has been suppressed and hidden by the programming of human consciousness by people in power. Thus it has to be re-discovered and ignited in each individual. 

          In strict sense, natural law is actually a principle – a fundamental truth. It is divine. It transcends all the artificial laws and takes precedence over them. While laws made by humans are fallible, natural law is infallible. It is timeless and immutable. It is not strictly synonymous with “conscience” however. This is because conscience has reduced to Moral Relativism and hence acts as an apologist for immoral acts committed. (Moral relativism is the idea that there is no universal or absolute set of moral principles and they vary from people to people and culture to culture)  

          The concept of natural law is inherent in each human being. Each human being gets a feeling when doing something ‘wrong’. Here wrong simply means an act that goes against natural law. It reminds him that he should not do it as something doesn’t feel right. It’s an intuitive feeling;
also like a voice from inside showing disagreement and reluctance to go ahead with the act. It is however also true that one’s mind can smother that voice by moral relativism and rationalising that act. More so if one has been living in a world where most have abdicated morality and hence have been programmed to act against the natural law.

     The world we live in was hijacked by such people who decided to violate the natural law as soon as it came into existence. We read similar mythological stories of fallen angels across several civilisations who were banished from the Kingdom of Heaven when they turned wicked. What exactly is ‘wicked’? It simply means going against the natural law. Wicked acts ultimately hurt someone or his free will. Hence against the natural law. Evil, wrong, corrupt and crime are synonymous with wicked in that sense.

          Let us analyse how acts against the natural law are crimes or wrongs. Stealing results into loss to someone. You yourself would not want anything stolen from you. Hence stealing is against the natural law. Killing results into taking the life of an individual which you would not want to be done to yourself. Hence it is against the natural law. Raping someone is wrong because someone’s personal body is being violated. You would not want something like that to happen to your body or your family. Hence it is against the natural law. Kidnapping is confinement of someone against his will. You would not want yourself to be in any such situation. Hence kidnapping is against the natural law. Telling lies results into misleading other person who will take decisions based on your lies. This may result into loss or harm to him. You would not like similar fate for yourself. Hence lying is against the natural law.  In conclusion, anything that is against the natural law would be wrong.

          This one natural law covers every aspect and is complete in itself. Free will is the freedom of choice. Natural law implies that any act that affects, supresses or restricts freedom of choice of someone directly or indirectly is wrong. So one should not impose any rule or law that an individual finds against his freedom of choice. Doesn’t matter whether it is ‘very beneficial’ law or it is ‘in the interest of society at large’ or for ‘greater good’. Individual and his right of free will is a natural right and is above any institution. This right should not be violated. This is because any delegation, suppression or destruction of it will result into one form of slavery or the other. People forming government to take decisions on their behalf is ‘delegation’ of free will. This results into few people legislating laws without involving all people or taking their consent. Those laws become the tool for control over and exploitation of the people. People are continuously milked for taxes, fed propaganda and recruited to carry on the agenda of politicians in power. This is nothing but a slave system. Government or authority of any kind is thus repugnant to natural law. The concept of government being formed to frame rules for the society doesn’t hold much water as well. Do we need any man-made law to live in harmony besides natural law? Natural law covers all the aspects and thus any other rule or law made by humans are redundant.

          Think of any law or rule that is in place and analyse whether natural law covers it or not. As discussed in a previous paragraph, it covers all the major crimes. Most of the other crimes as defined in law books are simply nuances of these basic crimes or wrongs. So we have an ultimate test to ascertain whether an act is right or wrong. If it against the natural law then it is wrong. Simple.

          Now the next argument for the framing of laws is defining the punishments for crime. The government in power frame laws to define punishments for the acts that society considers as crimes. Besides defining the crime, the punishment for committing it is also decided and coded. Now a very basic question is: who should decide the degree of punishment? Bunch of people in power, society or the person on whom the crime was committed? The correct answer is: the person on whom the crime was committed. No other person can decide what justice he ought to get. Society wants to look noble and caring. However, if that was the case then its job would be to catch the criminal and hand him over to the victim. Let victim decide what punishment the criminal should get. Instead society or government want to ‘act on behalf of people’ to frame laws and implement them. It gives itself all the power to frame and implement as it deems fit. In reality the creation of any such authority (society, government etc.) is to control, regulate and force obedience from people. The argument that it is constituted by the people and has will of the people is a deeply flawed and deceptive concept. Flawed because all people do not   participate in framing of those laws. Even their consent is not taken before implementation of those laws. Hence results into exploitation and injustice of some people. Deceptive because it is simply a mask of goodwill put on by wicked or power hungry people who want to control, force obedience and rule over people.

          Whether there can be any authority as per natural law that makes rules and takes decisions for individuals? Yes. Only if every such decision or rule is ratified by each individual and it must not apply to him unless he doesn’t give consent to it. A bunch of individuals even though elected by people doesn’t have the authority to violate free will of others. It is repugnant to natural law. Hence all governments and authority of any kind of modern world is against natural law. This is because consent of all is not taken while framing and imposing of laws made by such political systems.
Besides, the need and justification for creation of any authority to frame laws seems forced as natural law covers every aspects. Any other aspect is a creation of the current perverted system put in place by depraved people whose only agenda is to have power over people.
         
          In the current perverted world, the idea of right has been superseded by the idea of legitimate. Legitimate means anything conforming to the laws or rules in place. So some acts can become legitimate and illegitimate depending on present dispensation. For example, sometimes it becomes legitimate to drink alcohol and sometimes it becomes illegitimate. Likewise gathering of people in large numbers becomes illegitimate sometimes while it is legitimate on other occasions. It is quite clear that the concept of legitimacy is man-made and simply depends on the prevailing opinion of what is right. Right however is always right. An act cannot be right sometimes and wrong sometimes. An act is either right or wrong. There is no grey area. Drinking alcohol or taking drugs is an individual’s choice. It’s his free will to choose or not to choose. Unless he doesn’t harm anyone after taking these things, the act is not against natural law. Hence it is not wrong. If it is affecting his health he can be persuaded to leave the habit but the choice remains with him alone. Restricting his right to choose is against the natural law and hence is wrong. Similarly gathering of people in large number when not hurting anyone is not wrong by any means. On the contrary, restricting people to do so is against their free will and would be wrong.   

          Let us understand how governments and authorities comprising of few people are against the natural law by analysing these cases. 

A. Suppose we have 2 people – Adam and Satan. Both live as per natural law and no one transgresses on each other’s property and interferes in each other’s matters. Rules, if any, are made only when both are part of the deliberations and both agree to it.

B. Suppose we have 2 people – Adam and Satan. Satan comes one day and tells Adam that he has made a certain rule and Adam has to abide by it. Adam naturally protests and opposes it. However, Satan says that he can use force to enforce his rule. He then puts Adam in a prison. 

C. Suppose we have 2 people – Adam and Satan. Adam chooses Satan to take decisions for him on his behalf. Satan comes one day and tells Adam that he has made certain rule and Adam has to abide by it. Adam finds the rule as oppressive and protests against it. However, Satan says that he can use force to enforce his rule. He then puts Adam in a prison. 

D. Suppose there is a group of 100 people. They all participate in all decision making process and majority opinion reigns supreme. Others who oppose have also to abide by it.

E. Suppose there is a group of 100 people. They all participate in all decision making process and decisions are taken only when all agree.

F. Suppose there is a group of 100 people. They choose 5 amongst themselves to take decisions on their behalf. These 5 participate in all decision making process and opinion agreed to by all 5 reigns supreme. All 100 people are to abide by it whether they agree or not.

G. Suppose there is a group of 100 people. They choose 5 amongst themselves to take decisions on their behalf. These 5 participate in all decision making process and opinion agreed to by majority among 5 reigns supreme. All 100 people are to abide by it whether they agree or not.

      Only A and E follows natural law. All others are a form of slavery of one kind or the other. D, F and G are what we call modern governments of one form or the other. In F and G, the rules are being made by only a fraction of people and they are still to be obeyed whether people agree to it or not. This is nothing but slavery. 

      To eliminate the element of slavery, any rule which is made by a group of individuals and agreed by all of them should apply only to that group. It should not apply to anyone who was not part of that group or if he doesn’t consent to it. All decisions must be taken unanimously before imposing it on the group. Majority decision may not be right. But it can become acceptable only when it is agreed to and consented by all. In addition to that, any such decision or act must be imposed only on the people in that group. Depending on consent, a decision or an act becomes acceptable or unacceptable. No decision must be taken if all do not agree. That idea which is not unanimously accepted must be dropped. All these are required to ensure justice to everyone based on the natural law. 

          Any authority formed must follow the natural law and it must be temporary. As soon as the goal is reached it must be dissolved. The permanency of any authority is the reason why any form of government or authority gets corrupt. The problem is not who should sit on ‘chair’ but the problem is the continued existence of the ‘chair’.

      The idea of forming permanent governments for achievement of common goals is very dangerous. It is the precursor to the formation of slave system that we currently live in. Last chapter of this book deals with the same.       

*********************************************************************

 Support me  : 

 Buy my book- Links:
 




or Donate @ : paypal.me/FullyAwake 

Thank You.




Chapter 6 of my book - "Thoughts of a liberated mind"

Copyrighted material from the book - Thoughts of liberated mind

6. Origins of slavery

      Let us begin with one individual. Suppose he is the only one in the world. He is free. He has full freedom to take any decision. There is no one to be harmed by his actions. His freedom is not restricted. There is no right or wrong. But he is of good nature.

       A second individual comes. Both have to take into account the fact that their actions have consequences now. Their freedom is restricted in a sense that their actions should not harm the other. There is a concept of right and wrong now. The perception of this right and wrong is not artificial. It is as per the natural law and present in both of their consciousness. Each one is fully aware that his words and actions could harm the other and hence they respect each other’s freedom of choice and liberty. Any conflict of interest is resolved with the participation and consent of both. There is no violence.

       Now evil enters into the second person. Second individual starts to consider himself as superior (based on any of his traits - 
appearance, strength, knowledge, intelligence or health) to the first individual. The first person remains good and unaffected by evil so he doesn’t notice the changed behaviour of the second person. The second person hypnotizes himself that he is indeed superior to the first person. Evil takes hold of his mind and very soon, his words and actions. Second person thinks that he must be higher than the first person. He sees the opportunity of taking command over the first and enforce his obedience. He also sees the usefulness of the first being a tool to do work for him so that he may not even have to work for survival. He tries to convince the first that he should let him take decisions as he is better at it. He starts to take decisions unilaterally and later convinces the first through sophistry and lies. He starts lying regularly and manipulates the first to get what he wants from the first. The first person being good and being fed lies do not suspect and agree to the decisions of the second. Meanwhile the second person demands and accumulates resources for himself for the service of decision making and thinking for both of them. He convinces the other that this role is the most important thing and that he will be able to do it even better if he doesn’t have to work for survival. He thus starts collecting a part of products that are the result of the labour of the first. He further devises ways and structures to impose his authority over the first. He begins to feel that he need not even convince the first as he is too inferior and ‘low born’. He starts to coerce the first to submit to his will. He makes rules that benefits himself and demands obedience from the first. He constantly violates first's freedom, liberty and free will. He labels his rule as the truth. He floats ideas like 'survival of the fittest', 'merit' etc. He justifies his action stating that fittest or meritorious person must rule and look after the weak. The definition of 'fittest', 'merit' etc. are defined by him by the way. He brainwashes and programs the first that he is weak and unintelligent and hence he better let him govern his life. He constantly make rules that gradually takes all the freedom of choice of the first person. He takes all the decisions for the first.

        Now enters third individual. He is physically strong but not intelligent. He is corruptible however. He observes that the first person is miserable. He doesn’t want to be miserable too. He negotiates with the second. The second person offers him favours and resources in exchange of third person acting as a muscle man to curb revolt, if any, from the first person. Third person doesn’t have to work also. He starts enjoying the power he has over the first. He demands more resources and power from the second and sometimes have conflicts with him. However, soon the second convinces the third that if they stay together then they would rule over the first and enjoy forever. 

        More people are added to the group. They are either of first, second or third kind. Ninety nine percent of them follow what their kind do in the group. So we have people of the second kind ruling over the people of first kind with the help of the people of third kind. People of the second and third kind live off of the labour of the first kind. They keep all the resources under their ownership or control. They occasionally give some resources as limited ownership in exchange of perpetual taxes that the receiver has to pay for life. This they say is for safety, maintenance of the system and expenses for the administration of the system. They term it their moral duty to perform these administrative functions to continue running the system. In turn they state that they are doing a noble thing and providing safety and amenities to the people of the first kind (labourers). Labour class begins to believe that this is a minor sacrifice and necessary thing to survive. As long as there is no major threat to their existence labour class does not revolt.  


         Second and third kind grow greedy. They want to ensure that supremacy of their kind and their posterity to last for ever. They want all the ownership of all the resources for their kind. They keep the labour class (people of the first kind) illiterate and poor. They ensure that labourers never get required education to understand their oppressive rules, laws and system. They obscure the rules and laws. They spread their propaganda through all mediums of communications – word-of-mouth, folklore, stories, books, television, films etc. They lie and glorify about their divine origins, their noble birth and make stories about them being the descendants of the Gods themselves. They thus term their right to make laws as divine. They become masters and the first kind - labourers. As the people of second and third kind are dispensed with labour they have the liberty to think and invest time in coming up with new ideas. Each new idea and invention they come up is used to gain more power and resources for their kind. However, they portray it like it is for common good. As spin off of these ideas labourers do get paltry benefit. They are so distressed that they believe that their masters are kind, noble and benevolent. They see all these spin offs of these ideas as acts of kindness from their masters. They start respecting and obeying their masters. It is slowly and deeply ingrained in theirs and their children's mind. They become true slaves. 

          As the number of people grow, the people of the second and third kind, ensure that only a few get into their ranks. They place their people at all the centres of authorities. They corrupt people with greed and propaganda. They zealously protect their kind and do not mix with people of the first kind. They ensure that their kind marries within their kind. Seeing the increasing number of labour class compared to their kind, they feel that direct coercion through the people of the third kind is not possible. They then come up with ideas like ‘Rule of law’. It’s a subterfuge to divert the minds of the labour class as to who the real oppressor is. And to let them feel that no one is in command, but only ‘law’ is! And they ensure that only their people get to frame, deliberate and make these laws. After all, these laws are so complex and full of sophistry that an average person of labour class would not understand them. Anyways, they have kept the labour class illiterate and poor. So they know that there would hardly be any resistance. All they need to do is tell more lies, obscure the true intention of these laws and brain wash labour class so that they think that these laws are for justice. They start making structures of law to obfuscate their propaganda to extend total control of the labour class. Though benevolent these laws may appear to labour class but they forget that its creator, executer and adjudicator are all from master class. And this would end up in application of these laws onto labour class only while the master class would escape its applicability on one pretext or the other citing inherent ambiguity (introduced for their benefit since inception) or a manufactured one. Adjudicator (of master kind) of such law would naturally be inclined to favour their kind. If everything fails, they will delay the whole process or create diversions of serious kind and labour class would forget about it anyways with time.

         As the common consciousness of labour class rises, they start asking for their rights and other privileges. Master class then comes up with other ideas of governance that promises to give these rights. Master class feel that an illusion of choice and freedom must be given to the labour class to prevent any revolt. This is because the labour class has increased considerably and the master class - only a fraction. They then float ideas like capitalism, socialism, communism, republic, democracy, welfare state etc. Each one is a form of authority that caters to the diverse ideologies labour class may think of. They put all these propaganda in the education system. Hence, enough ideologies and ideas of a state or a nation are floated that people can relate to. This also successfully creates divisions amongst people. Instead of fighting the authority that brings misery to them they fight amongst themselves about whose ideology must be implemented! Hence the master class achieve their purpose of keeping their authority, preventing revolt and keep the labour class working for their system wilfully. They further brainwash people with ideas like ‘patriotism’, ‘duty towards nation’, ‘constitution is supreme’, ‘respect for constitutional institutions’ etc. All these are artificial constructs to demand, ensure and coerce people into obedience. Violence and wars for defending these ideas become acceptable and many consider it to be their moral duty! It also creates an illusion in the minds of the people that they are serving or obeying no one but only law. They feel and believe that they are free. The deception and programming is complete.

        Master class creates a system (social, economic, political, legal, financial etc.) whose main purpose is to benefit their kind in most convoluted ways. They tax people in invisible ways. These systems are so complex and obscure that common person of the labour class would not understand. Besides, the education system teaches people what the master class wants them to know. They use education system to indoctrinate children and programme masses to obey the structures of authority. They own all the media who spew their propaganda 24*7. They own all the corporations and so they decide what news labour class will hear, what food they will eat, what clothes they will wear, what music they will listen to etc. Through television and films they condition people to behave in a particular way which is desired for their system. They choose celebrities who are popular and rich with their money to spread their propaganda. These means of entertainments are also used to distract people from the actual problems people are having. Master class wants continued obedience of the people. However, they discovered that a slave is most productive when he has an illusion of choice and freedom. Also when he is entertained. Besides, after exploiting and extorting labour class by means of hard labour and taxes, master class ensure that they provide several forms of entertainments to distract people from their miserable lives. So entertainment serves as both a tool for programming and distraction. Certain behaviours are rewarded by master class to further encourage people to behave in ways that is conducive to their system. They reward cunningness, cut-throat attitude, greed, manipulative nature, liars, psychopaths, moral depravity etc. Why? Because they want people to engage in mindless rat race with narcissism and ‘me-me’ attitude. It programmes people to think wickedly, be opportunistic and have no love for fellow human being. Thus such behaviour ensures that there can seldom be any unity and agreement between people. All will look after their greed and can betray anyone for their gains. This helps the system as system with enormous amount of money can corrupt anyone who is greedy or ask him to betray any group that has risen against the system. All these behaviours are glorified in books, stories, films etc. to condition labour class to become corrupt and wicked. A materialistic life is glorified with mindless and unnecessary things which have no real worth. However, master class succeeds because they know all the techniques of programming. People of labour class become busy and competitive in achieving goals and gathering things. They find misery when they fail or are happy when they get what they want. Either case they become too sad or too happy to look for truth. They will not even listen when it is shown to them!

      Such is the indoctrination and programming of slavery in the minds of the labour class that they would not welcome any idea of questioning the authority of their masters. So much so that they will not let even one among them to speak who tries to expose the truth. They will outcast and boycott him. Obeying the authority is what they have done all their life and their ancestors before. How can there be anything wrong with the system? After all, what is harm in obeying and sacrificing some of their earnings to their masters in exchange of safety and amenities that are provided to them in return? They deeply believe that their masters are noble men who make laws, executes them and deliver justice based on those laws. Even though they were not part of the law making process! They are even fine with the visible fact that they are constantly poor despite working to their bones but their masters are always rich doing no hard labour. 

           Some among the labour class get some education and rise a bit higher in the hierarchy. They are given just enough opportunity by the master class to make them feel good with a sense of achievement. But as they move up, they begin to understand the game. They understand the ruthlessness, fake benevolent mask and politics of master class. At this point, they are either co-opted by the master class by deluding them to think that with their worth they must act and behave like one of the master class or are quickly shown their status and kicked out of the hierarchy on one pretext or the other. One who are co-opted are the ones who mimics the behaviour of master class and themselves become as evil and cut-throat as the master class. They are kept in the hierarchy as long as they do not interfere in the agenda of the master class. They are rewarded for this occasionally to keep them in the delusion that they belong to the elite class. But when they start to get powerful and begin to interfere they are kicked out immediately from their high posts through constant harassment, ridicule and conspiracy.

      Labour class cannot thus get their freedom, rights and liberty back as long as the higher levels of the system are populated by the master class. Most of the labour class are good and not evil. They are satisfied with modest life. They are peaceful and want to live in peace. Hence they cannot match the ruthlessness and depravity of master class. Moreover, all the centres of power - legislatures, executive and judiciary are populated by master class at the highest decision making levels. So master class is the maker of the law, judge, jury and the executioner. 

       So it is imperative that any act that takes away freedom and liberty of an individual must be resisted on the very first instance of its occurrence with full force. Inaction in this regard will result into slavery just like the world we live in. Evil starts when freedom is taken away.                

*********************************************************************

 Support me  : 

 Buy my book- Links:
 




or Donate @ : paypal.me/FullyAwake 

Thank You.